RIVERS AND STREAMS ACTION PLAN

 
Compiled by the Environment Agency

 

Lead Agencies:             Public Sector                   Environment Agency

                                                Voluntary Sector              RSPB

 

1       INTRODUCTION

 

Rivers and streams are exceptionally varied and dynamic habitats forming invaluable wildlife habitat. Interactions between topography, geology and rainfall influence their biological and physical diversity.

 

Rivers and streams in Northamptonshire vary from the fast flowing streams rising in the southern and western uplands of the county, to the wide, slow-moving lowland River Nene.

 

These watercourses form, either in their own right or in association with other habitats, a vital nature conservation and wildlife resource for the county.

 

 

2       CURRENT STATUS

 

Habitats included in this plan:

Rivers

Streams

 

Associated Plans:

Open Standing Water

 

2.1    Definitions

 

Of the major rivers that flow through Northamptonshire, the Tove, Great Ouse, Avon and Nene have their sources in the southern and western upland areas of the county. Whilst the Great Ouse and Tove flow east into Bedfordshire and the Avon flows west into Warwickshire, the Nene flows from its source near Daventry in the south west, to Wansford in the north east, before crossing the county boundary into Peterborough. The River Welland forms part of Northamptonshire’s northern boundary.

 

Northamptonshire’s southern and western uplands constitute the north-eastern extent of the Cotswold limestone range. The many small tributaries of the upper Nene are mostly spring fed, flowing through a mixed arable and pastoral landscape. The streams are mostly small, winding, narrow channels with bed substrates ranging from solid limestone to gravels and muddy silts. 

 

Tributaries drain into the Nene along its entire length through Northamptonshire, the major tributaries being the Brampton Nene, River Ise, Harper’s Brook and Willow Brook.  These streams and small rivers vary considerably in size, volume and water quality. Some drain agricultural land whilst others have almost entirely urban catchments. Similarly there is variation in the riparian habitat associated with each of these watercourses; some are highly engineered drainage channels, whilst others are open and exposed in the agricultural landscape, denuded of bank-side trees and shrubs.

 

Some lengths of stream remain secluded and relatively untouched, allowing trees, shrubs and thick vegetation cover to develop, providing corridors along which flora and fauna can move and disperse, as well as supporting a diverse invertebrate fauna.

 

Example One: River Ise and Meadows SSSI. Grid Ref: SP 860831 to 891831

This section of the River Ise is the best example of a lowland river on clay in the county and has a variety of semi-natural features now uncommon in areas of intensive agriculture.

 

From around Northampton the River Nene develops into a typical lowland river, being wide and slow moving.  Between Northampton and Thrapston the river remains in close association with the gravel workings, both current and disused. From Thrapston downstream to Wansford the river retains its lowland character remaining in association with flood meadows, wet grazing pasture and some arable fields.

 

The water level between Northampton and the Dog-in- a Doublet Sluice, Cambridgeshire, is maintained artificially to enable navigation, flowing through a landscape which is broad and open. Some stretches are bordered by woodland, such as downstream of Oundle, and along many stretches mature willow pollards line the riverbank.

 

Most of the rivers and streams in Northamptonshire have been engineered or managed to some extent and this is particularly true of stretches of watercourses running through or downstream of urban areas.

 

The River Nene is eutrophic; receiving treated sewage effluent discharges from the Whilton, Billing, Broadholme and Corby sewage treatment works. Agricultural run-off also contributes to the levels of nitrates and phosphates in the river. This nutrient rich water supports high plant productivity, especially along the fringes. Routine weed cutting is undertaken along the length of the river for flood defence purposes and, along the section between Northampton and Wansford, to ensure the river remains navigable.

 

Water is abstracted from the Nene at Duston and Wansford for drinking and at various locations for crop irrigation.

 

2.2    National Status

 

Rivers and streams are of immense wildlife value. This value is derived from the morphology, shape, size, gradient and base rock material of the channel. These characteristics help to support a wide diversity of flora and fauna, many of which are only associated with running water and some which are unique to specific river types.

 

Rivers and streams are, in essence, wildlife arteries in the landscape, providing continuous corridors along which species of flora and fauna can migrate. In some areas, such as urban and intensively farmed landscapes, watercourses may provide the only opportunity for species to move from one area to another.

 

2.3           Local Status

 

The Environment Agency is responsible for the management of 542km of the River Nene and its tributaries in Northamptonshire. Virtually all the streams and rivers in the county have been managed to some extent to aid drainage of farmland, reduce the frequency of flooding and to maintain navigation.

Despite this, there remain many stretches of quiet and secluded watercourse throughout the county. 92 County Wildlife Sites have been designated for riparian sites and several SSSIs that include stretches of rivers and riverside habitats have been notified in Northamptonshire.

 

 

3            CHARACTERISTIC SPECIES

 

3.1    National Priority Species

 

Otter (Lutra lutra), Water vole (Arvicola terrestris), White-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) and Compressed river mussel (Pseudanodonta complanata).


3.2    Local Priority Species

 

Black poplar (Populus nigra betulifolia), Beautiful demoiselle (Calopteryx virgo), Lister’s river snail (Viviparus contectus) and White-legged damselfly (Platycnemis pennipes)

 

See Appendix 1 Rivers and Wetlands Priority Species for full lists

 

 

4              CURRENT FACTORS AFFECTING HABITAT

 

·         Eutrophication is a major threat to the water quality and conservation status of watercourses in Northamptonshire. Elevated phosphate concentrations in particular, caused primarily by treated sewage effluent discharges can, under suitable conditions, stimulate excessive growth of algae and duckweed. In combination with low river flows and prolonged warm summers, there is the possibility that algal blooms could occur in some of the major watercourses in the county. Not only can these blooms be directly toxic, but once developed they increase turbidity and reduce light penetration into the water, adversely affecting the entire ecosystem. It is not uncommon for algal blooms to strip dissolved oxygen from the water leading to major fish kills. 

·         Elevated nitrate and phosphate levels can also promote excessive growth of fringe vegetation, leading to an increased need for maintenance works, which have the potential to further damage the river channel and its associated flora.

·         Other pollutants also affect water quality throughout the county. The long-term impact of persistent pesticides, heavy metals and oestrogenic substances present in historic and, to a lesser extent, in current discharges are not fully understood. They may have acute or chronic toxic effects or cause abnormalities such as sterility in certain species.

Accidental or deliberate pollution incidents periodically occur, with varying consequences depending upon the material discharged and the time of year.

·         Abstraction for public water supply and irrigation continues to adversely affect flows in the county’s major rivers. Low flows exacerbate the problems of eutrophication, as outlined above.

·         Land drainage and management, particularly in the upper reaches of streams and rivers, has led to the interception of springs and the drainage of wet flushes and mires, reducing the flow of groundwater into rivers and streams. Drainage has also provided the opportunity to extend arable cultivation to the edge of riverbanks, with the loss of the buffering effect of headlands and margins. This has resulted in the loss of marginal, bank-side and instream habitat; increased siltation of gravel beds that are rich in invertebrates and used as spawning grounds by fish; increased seepage of herbicides and pesticides into the watercourse and a continued demand for regular maintenance works.

·         Alien and invasive species remain a threat if not managed appropriately. Species such as Himalayan balsam and Japanese knotweed are highly invasive, able to spread and colonise new areas quickly, choking and crowding out native vegetation.

·         Navigational and flood defence structures and impoundments such as water mills, on-line lakes, weirs and locks can prevent fish migration.

·         Fishing and fish farming can be a source of conflict with nature conservation interests. This may result from the establishment of fish farms and the associated changes in flow patterns in the adjacent watercourses or the generation of sediment and polluting loads. Escapes of non-native crayfish and fish into watercourses have the potential to cause considerable damage to populations of native species. There is also the potential for direct conflicts between anglers and species such as Cormorant, Heron, Otter or Pike, and for disturbance of rivers and their banks during the bird breeding season.

·         Climate change may affect the status of the county’s rivers and streams in the long term, though the probable local affects are still poorly understood.

 

 

5             CURRENT ACTION

 

·         The Environment Agency currently protects and maintains water resources and quality through statutory licensing.

·         Much of the engineering work undertaken on the county’s watercourses occurred prior to 1991 (when the Water Act provided new powers and duties to protect the water environment) and was not always carried out sympathetically in environmental terms.

Whilst improvement targets are largely aimed towards long-term water quality objectives, some river restoration has taken place and all engineering works are now screened for potential environmental impacts.

·         The Environment Agency has undertaken a range of habitat enhancement initiatives on the Nene, Welland and a number of their tributaries. This work has included bank reprofiling, pool and riffle reinstatements, creation of fish refuges and washlands, meander reinstatements and tree planting schemes.

·         The Environment Agency holds data from River Corridor and Habitat surveys, fishery and invertebrate survey data, water quality and abstraction data and some species survey data for otters, water voles, waders, native crayfish and rare aquatic plants. This data predominantly relate to stretches termed as “Main River” which are those lengths maintained by the Environment Agency for flood defence. Regular flow monitoring is also undertaken by the Agency.

·         Anglian Water Services Ltd. (AWS) holds abstraction data for its reservoirs. English Nature holds data relating to riverine SSSIs and Northamptonshire Wildlife Trust holds historical data, site records and maintains a biological record database.

 

 


6. RIVERS AND STREAMS OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS

 

 

OBJECTIVE

ACTION

LEAD AGENCY

PARTNERS

TARGETS

6.1

Policy and Legislation

 

Objective One:

Encourage sympathetic management of all watercourses for wildlife

Monitor and enforce appropriate water quality standards. Produce strategies to reduce the impact of abstraction (Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies – “CAMS”) and discharges (under the EU Water Framework Directive)

Environment Agency

Anglian Water, Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group

First stage of CAMS completed by 2006.

All surface and ground waters to have “good” ecological quality by 2016.

 

Objective Two:

Ensure that BAP species and their habitats are given an appropriate level of protection in local plans

Include habitat and species protection policies in local plans and/or supplementary guidance

Local Authorities

 

 

Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, English Nature

By 2003

6.2

Site Safeguard and Management

 

 

 

 

 

Objective Three:

Establish best practice for riparian management with landowners and managers

Promote good practice e.g. establishment of buffer strips along riverbanks, through agri-environment schemes and the provision of advice

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group, Environment Agency

20% of main rivers buffered by 2006

 

Objective Four:

Encourage a catchment wide approach to identifying sites suitable for conservation initiatives and for the targeting of improved management regimes

Design and implement habitat improvement programmes on the most suitable stretches of river. Develop whole river restoration schemes

Environment Agency

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group , English Nature , Local Authorities, Landowners

5 habitat improvement plans implemented by 2006

 

Objective Five:

Stop and reduce the spread of alien weed species on river and stream banks

Develop and implement a collaborative strategy to identify affected areas, and to eradicate the problem species where feasible

 

Environment Agency

BAP Partners

Strategy developed by 2002.

6.3

Research and Monitoring

 

 

 

 

 

Objective Six:

Establish comprehensive baseline data sets from which current riverine ecological quality can be determined. Develop monitoring programmes to determine changes in habitat quality and species distributions

Collate and interpret current available data on the county’s rivers. Identify gaps in existing knowledge and implement surveys as appropriate. Use this baseline to initiate regular monitoring of riverine ecology

Environment Agency

Wildlife Trust, English Nature

Monitoring programme already established. Monitoring programmes under the Water Framework Directive to commence in 2007

6.4

Advisory

 

 

 

 

 

Objective Seven:

Influence riparian management plans, policies and decisions to protect and enhance watercourses

Use and apply survey and monitoring data to ensure appropriate management strategies are adopted

Environment Agency

BAP Partners

Advisory Strategy in place by 2002

 

Objective Eight:

Encourage better practical management skills for both maintenance crews and staff involved in decision-making processes (e.g. planners; development control and decision support staff)

Establish training courses to enable workers to gain new, or refresh existing skills and knowledge

Environment Agency

Wildlife Trust, Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group

Local Authorities

Training programmes established by 2003

6.5

Communication and Publicity

 

 

 

 

Objective Nine:

Ensure opportunities are taken to raise awareness of the importance of rivers and streams for nature conservation, amenity and aesthetic value

Produce and promote information on the county’s rivers to encourage conservation and sensitive river management. Provide representatives and interpretation at local shows and events. Provide on-site interpretation

Wildlife Trust

Environment Agency, RSPB, English Nature, Anglian Water, Local Authorities

Collaborative plan in place by 2003

 

Objective Ten:

Publicise the progress made in delivering this Action Plan in a BAP Annual Report

 

 

BAP Partners

Annual

 

 

Next Page

 

Return to Rivers and Wetlands

 

Return to Contents